Latino Issues

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Miguel Rodriguez on January 30, 2009 at 6:31am

Fernando: what is your definition of "Latino"?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Fernando A Camacho on February 3, 2009 at 3:41pm

The point here is to see how we can identify ourselves better, hispano or latino...

I don't have any preference, but a focus group we did in the past, the results were very impressive, most of the people from latinamerica in the ast cost wants to be identified as latino while in the southwest they would like more to be identified as hispanics.

Even though that the first time that the term hispanc was introduced in the United States was during the 60s when the federal government would like to classify certain individual living in this country, since then, the government and businesses here in the USA have used more and more the term hispanic.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Miguel Rodriguez on February 3, 2009 at 5:02pm

..and what would be your take on the definition of latino? Who is included?

Fernando A Camacho said:

The point here is to see how we can identify ourselves better, hispano or latino...

I don't have any preference, but a focus group we did in the past, the results were very impressive, most of the people from latinamerica in the ast cost wants to be identified as latino while in the southwest they would like more to be identified as hispanics.

Even though that the first time that the term hispanc was introduced in the United States was during the 60s when the federal government would like to classify certain individual living in this country, since then, the government and businesses here in the USA have used more and more the term hispanic.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Claudia Halfpenny on February 4, 2009 at 3:51pm

I think you guys have two different questions here. One is who is latino/hispanic and the other, what are the issues faced. Personally, I don't need to distinguish who is or not latino to answer this question. It's latino whoever feels that way for different reasons. According to my experience the issues are mainly social. Some social traits within the american society come very easy to americans but somehow make it harder for foreign people - all foreign people - to integrate. I am not saying we should all act the same way, and matter of fact, I believe in it being more fun when we're different but not in the professional arena, that doesn't seem to work very well. Corporations advocate for "vive la difference" but the bottom line is they want their employees to be predictable. Coming from different backgrounds that sounds a bit unrealistic to a certain point? What does everybody think? As for the first question - who's latino, hispanic and why I say it's a different string altogether. Post it if you want to discuss, I promise to put in my two cents if anyone wants to hear about it!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Miguel Rodriguez on February 9, 2009 at 12:20pm

I will ask my question a different way: there are five languages (lenguas romances) and sub-cultures derived from Latin; they are: Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese and Romanian. All these are, by definition, latin laguages/sub-cultures and none more 'latin' than the other. Now, when you use the term Latino, are you including all these folks?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Fabian on February 15, 2009 at 3:16am

Miguel: You have not answer Fernando's question. Chicano, Latino, Hispano, etc... Why to we have to categorize ourselves and fit in one box. What about the word Americans? Is that a term only for U.S. citizens or for the people in the America continent.

Job security and immigration is some of the major issues affecting our community. For example, the construction industry is laying off hundreds of Latinos/Hispanos/Chicanos/Americans/immigrants. Besides the standard consequences in home, Mexico, Central America, and South America are obtaining less "remezas" and less money is slowing their economies.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Miguel Rodriguez on February 16, 2009 at 10:12am

That is precesely the question behind my question... Why do we tend to 'label' ourselves therefore, by definiiton becoming sectarian? What do we gain with that? Who do we want to leave out? Why?

Fabian said:

Miguel: You have not answer Fernando's question. Chicano, Latino, Hispano, etc... Why to we have to categorize ourselves and fit in one box. What about the word Americans? Is that a term only for U.S. citizens or for the people in the America continent.

Job security and immigration is some of the major issues affecting our community. For example, the construction industry is laying off hundreds of Latinos/Hispanos/Chicanos/Americans/immigrants. Besides the standard consequences in home, Mexico, Central America, and South America are obtaining less "remezas" and less money is slowing their economies.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by LANYON on February 16, 2009 at 7:22pm

Regarding our identity.... HIspanic or Latino? Blame the government and their politically correct emphasis, and to make the census process easier; now they have 17 different classifications. From the Hispanic Pew Center:
The word Hispanic is a generic term derived from the word España, which is the Spanish word for Spain. People of any race who trace their family origin to a Spanish-speaking country are Hispanic. Hispanic people can be of any race. They constitute a pluralistic society of many national origins.
Latino - because I am from Latin America.
Hispanic - Only because the U.S. Census Bureau created a new ‘category’ named "Hispanic".
Spanish – because I speak Spanish or am from Spanish ancestors.
Chicano - Describes the new mix of Mexican-American population.

I would rather that all this would go away and not be politically correct...... when you ask anyone what is their identity, the answer is Colombiano, Venezolana, Mejicano, Chileno, Argentina, etc. Only second, third generations are identified by Latino or Hispanic, mostly when dealing with governmental issues.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Martha B. Gallegos on June 26, 2009 at 3:06pm

Latino is anyone whose culture is derivative of those countries which speak a Romance Language. Hispanic is anyone whose culture originated in HISPANIA, i. e. the Iberian Peninsula. Historically, los hispanos somos aquéllos que hablamos los idiomas de Hispania, como fue llamada por los romanos. Yo no creo ni en las categorias ni en las nacionalidades pero para propósito de este país qué remedio? pero no todos los hispanos somos latinos, si?

LANYON said:

Regarding our identity.... HIspanic or Latino? Blame the government and their politically correct emphasis, and to make the census process easier; now they have 17 different classifications. From the Hispanic Pew Center:
The word Hispanic is a generic term derived from the word España, which is the Spanish word for Spain. People of any race who trace their family origin to a Spanish-speaking country are Hispanic. Hispanic people can be of any race. They constitute a pluralistic society of many national origins. Latino - because I am from Latin America. Hispanic - Only because the U.S. Census Bureau created a new ‘category’ named "Hispanic".
Spanish – because I speak Spanish or am from Spanish ancestors.
Chicano - Describes the new mix of Mexican-American population.

I would rather that all this would go away and not be politically correct...... when you ask anyone what is their identity, the answer is Colombiano, Venezolana, Mejicano, Chileno, Argentina, etc. Only second, third generations are identified by Latino or Hispanic, mostly when dealing with governmental issues.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Cesar A. Cisneros on June 30, 2009 at 8:17pm

As a person of Latin American heritage, I consider myself an American by all definitions. I do not accept or agree to be pigeon holed by people who do not know me or know about my background and customs, and I feel that people who coin labels to identify every one else but themselves, should also include themselves into the labeling game. After all, who ever gave any one particular group of people the exclusive right to call themselves absolute owners or inhabitants of the american continent ? The Northern Europeans who arrived at the shores of America nearly 200 years after the land had been discovered and populated by Spain, have somewhat assumed that they are americans and that the rest of us are not.
I am an American, I was born in America therefore I am a son of America the beautiful. Spanish was the first language spoken in america, and Spanish customs along with their advanced educational system were implemented and in full existence before any other Northern European country's was.
So to answer your question: As a person born in a Central American republic, I am an American whose first language is Spanish. An American with Indigenous and Spanish roots deeply imbeded in American soil.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by LatPro on December 16, 2009 at 3:25pm

Fernando A Camacho said:

This has troubled other people as well. Laura Luisa Negron Pagan, a Puerto Rican living in Texas, considers this concept and the exclusivity with which each of the Latinoamerican cultures experience each other, particularly in Texas, where Mexican culture seems to obliterate all the other ones. And she points to a yahoo definition of Hispanic:

I am just clearing up an issue of attribution. Ms Aurea Luisa Negron Pagan should be the person sited in the article, not Laura.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Nellie Cathleen Quiroga on December 19, 2009 at 10:52am

One issue that my husband and I had when we came up from South America was that nothing we had done there counted in the USA. We had to start over. We went to great trouble paying for translation of references through the US Consulate.

My husband was studying architecture and had considerable hands-on residential and commercial experience meeting with businesses or families, making the plans, developing scale models, overseeing construction, putting in sauna, pools and landscaping and working out "the bugs" on site with the families visiting to give input. Unheard of in the US. He had pictures of everything. We made over 100 contacts in the US and he even offered to work for free to prove what he could do. I went with him at his request on his last interview. The architect told him that he was lying after he showed him everything. I stood up nose to nose with the man and told him that I was born in the US, my father and uncle were custom home builders, and that I had witnessed personally all the work my husband had done. Was he going to call me a liar? He backed off and started to stutter. Then I told him that the reason he was rejecting my husband was that my husband had more experience than he did; that my husband was a humble person and would work hard for him; that the loser was not my husband but the loser was himself for his lack of people skills and knowledge of what is going on around the world. We left and my husband told me that he was tired of being abused by the US system and he never went back to another interview at an architectural office. For over 20 years my husband has worked at low-paying jobs in hotels, and is a manager. But his dream was lost for good!

▶ Reply to This

▶ Reply to This